[seedig] Pettition according to ToR, Art 7.
Dr. Vladimer Svanadze
vsvanadze at indein.net
Tue Dec 17 10:17:54 CET 2019
My support for the pettition!
Best,
Lado
On 12/17/2019 12:23 AM, Mocanu Veronica via seedig wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> By this e-mail I express my support for pettition.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mocanu Veronica
>
> --
> Sent from Mail.ru app for Android
>
> Monday, 16 December 2019, 04:20pm +02:00 from Tetiana Kyryliuk via
> seedig seedig at lists.rnids.rs <mailto:seedig at lists.rnids.rs>:
>
> I support the petition!
>
> The reasons are clear and raise no doubts.
>
>
> Best,
> Tetiana Kyryliuk
>
> пн, 16 дек. 2019 г. в 13:31, Dušan Stojičević <dusan at dukes.in.rs
> <mailto:dusan at dukes.in.rs>>:
>
> Dear all,
>
> It’s always nice to see peaceful, politically correct mailings
> and calls for calming down, I tend to agree with them all by
> default, but the problem will not fly away itself, if we don’t
> tackle the essence of the issues that you wrote about. It is
> seen in many initiatives with multistakeholder roots, it’s not
> first time that I am seeing this in IG surroundings – move the
> problems under the carpet until the carpet reach the ceilings…
>
> If some people like to think that my mailings are harsh and I
> am attacking people – so be it, I can easily step down as list
> admin and leave this community, as I already stepped down from
> any single role that I had in this initiative so far (exe com
> member, web admin, FB admin etc) leaving room for new fresh
> people. As someone who was contributing to this initiative
> from the very beginning, the growth of initiative should not
> depend on me. All those positions that I had were voluntary
> positions, and I don’t have any personal benefit out of those
> roles, except work. And I am not keen to support the
> initiative where people likes to be in a position, plays as
> “wannabe politicians” and at the same time, they don’t show
> intention to work. That’s not what we was trying to build.
> Above that, to use that position to criticize someone else’s
> work – this right is not earned just by position. Therefore,
> let see what is hidden under the carpet – let start with
> accountability of people in positions. This is part of
> democratic process, good practice, transparency and good
> governance, isn’t it?
>
> According to ToR Art 7., and as a voting member, I am
> initiating a petition for removing individual member Dusan Caf
> from executive committee.
>
> Reasons:
>
> 1.According to Art 4.1 of ToR, item d.
>
> As organizer and official representative of host at Ljubljana
> meeting (his organization was paying the bills for meeting,
> known fact), and active member of executive committee, he
> didn’t provide the financial report for more than a year. On
> the website, this report was seen after SEEDIG meeting in
> Bucharest, somewhere in 3Q this year (date of publishing is
> somewhere in late July 2019.).
>
> Without any doubts, harm is done to the SEEDIG. For example,
> SEEDIG could have benefited from an UN grant (we heard about
> that in Bucharest); I hear that this did not happen and that
> the delayed publication of the report contributed to this.
>
> Clearly, by delaying the financial reporting for so long,
> there can be raised fair suspicion and inquiry on how the host
> was handling the money. But, I still want to believe that
> laziness is the reason, nothing else.
>
> 2.According to Art 4.1 of ToR, item g and h
>
> Instead of consulting the community about all significant
> matters, this member of executive committee wrote a personal
> blog, raising concerns around SEEDIG in public. More than
> that, he was writing personal emails to the sponsors, without
> knowledge of community or, to the best of my knowledge, rest
> of executive committee. The emails was forwarded to me by some
> sponsors, with whom I have very active business. Blog can be
> found here
> https://blog.caf.si/2019/11/reflections-on-my-two-years-in-seedig.html.
>
>
> If you are surprised with this blog from November, it’s
> exactly what is regulated by those items g and h in ToR – you
> should not be, but you are. Also you can easily see that,
> roughly, half of this blog is not true (there are mailings in
> the archive that proves he wrongly explained certain moments
> in SEEDIG history, which he was not taking part) and half of
> the blog are alleged issues and problems which he NEEDED to
> share with community and colleagues in exe com. This way,
> without knowledge of entire community, he criticizes many
> thing, expressing his opinion based on mostly wrong facts, and
> he created fake news, the worst kind – mix of “a little bit of
> truth” and “a little bit of fake” makes the “perfect deal”.
> More on that, the blog was shared on social networks by some
> of the sponsors with a lot of question marks about the future
> of SEEDIG, and by that, he was ruining hardly built trust
> between sponsors and SEEDIG as initiative.
>
> I don’t know how it went with members of exe com or other
> members of SEEDIG, but I was spending a lot of my time to
> answer to some of the sponsors, connected with them in my line
> of business, that truth is not written in that blog.
>
> 3.According to Art 4.1 of ToR, item h
>
> Recent meddling in election process, by asking for a report
> which is not regulated by ToR, and to the best of my
> knowledge, not in any decision of exe com, through the mail
> sent to the list: there is a concern that he was trying to
> intimidate the chair and all members of election committee. At
> least, by asking that, he was putting pressure to the election
> committee and all members, obviously not happy with the
> preliminary results, jeopardizing the whole election process
> and undermining the work of election committee. This is a very
> bad and dangerous practice shown from this exe com member, and
> he should be removed just for that.
>
> 4.According to Art 4.2 of ToR
>
> It’s really questionable if this member of executive was
> fulfilling obligation of 5-6 working hours per week: If the
> regular obligations was not finished on time, as described in
> the reason under point 1., he obviously was not fulfilling
> this obligation also.
>
> Conclusion – according to ToR, he is not fit to serve as exe
> com member, obviously he is not fit to work in a team and what
> is worse, he is putting the whole SEEDIG initiative in danger
> by his “personally initiated” (in)activities. It will be a big
> danger if he stays one more year of his mandate as a member.
>
> In line with Art 7.3 in the ToR, I ask and invite community
> members to back up this petition - it needs 10% of the total
> number of members of this list to trigger a vote on removing
> Dusan Caf from the exe com. If you are concern about SEEDIG,
> this is a concrete way to express your concerns and clean up
> what is hidden under the carpet.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dusan Stojicevic
>
> --
> */Kind regards,/*
> */Tetiana Kyryliuk/*
> */Founder&Managing Director/*
> */The Influencer Platform/*
> */
> /*
> Ukraine, Kyiv
> Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/kyryliuk.t>
> Twitter <https://twitter.com/TIP_Influencer>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.rnids.rs/pipermail/seedig/attachments/20191217/7c6df4d5/attachment.htm>
More information about the seedig
mailing list