[seedig] Pettition according to ToR, Art 7.

[Lianna Galstyan]

Dear SEEDIG Community,


I would add my support to this petition.


I don’t have much to add to what my ExCom colleagues Sonia and Sorina 
said. Just to emphasize that the last several months we were unable to 
work in full team and take decisions necessary for the advancement of 
SEEDIG.


I believe that SEEDIG Community is strong enough to overcome the current 
challenges and move forward to the best of regional success!


Best,

Lianna

On 12/16/2019 3:30 PM, Dušan Stojičević wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> It’s always nice to see peaceful, politically correct mailings and 
> calls for calming down, I tend to agree with them all by default, but 
> the problem will not fly away itself, if we don’t tackle the essence 
> of the issues that you wrote about. It is seen in many initiatives 
> with multistakeholder roots, it’s not first time that I am seeing this 
> in IG surroundings – move the problems under the carpet until the 
> carpet reach the ceilings…
>
> If some people like to think that my mailings are harsh and I am 
> attacking people – so be it, I can easily step down as list admin and 
> leave this community, as I already stepped down from any single role 
> that I had in this initiative so far (exe com member, web admin, FB 
> admin etc) leaving room for new fresh people. As someone who was 
> contributing to this initiative from the very beginning, the growth of 
> initiative should not depend on me. All those positions that I had 
> were voluntary positions, and I don’t have any personal benefit out of 
> those roles, except work. And I am not keen to support the initiative 
> where people likes to be in a position, plays as “wannabe politicians” 
> and at the same time, they don’t show intention to work. That’s not 
> what we was trying to build. Above that, to use that position to 
> criticize someone else’s work – this right is not earned just by 
> position. Therefore, let see what is hidden under the carpet – let 
> start with accountability of people in positions. This is part of 
> democratic process, good practice, transparency and good governance, 
> isn’t it?
>
> According to ToR Art 7., and as a voting member, I am initiating a 
> petition for removing individual member Dusan Caf from executive 
> committee.
>
> Reasons:
>
> 1.According to Art 4.1 of ToR, item d.
>
> As organizer and official representative of host at Ljubljana meeting 
> (his organization was paying the bills for meeting, known fact), and 
> active member of executive committee, he didn’t provide the financial 
> report for more than a year. On the website, this report was seen 
> after SEEDIG meeting in Bucharest, somewhere in 3Q this year (date of 
> publishing is somewhere in late July 2019.).
>
> Without any doubts, harm is done to the SEEDIG. For example, SEEDIG 
> could have benefited from an UN grant (we heard about that in 
> Bucharest); I hear that this did not happen and that the delayed 
> publication of the report contributed to this.
>
> Clearly, by delaying the financial reporting for so long, there can be 
> raised fair suspicion and inquiry on how the host was handling the 
> money. But, I still want to believe that laziness is the reason, 
> nothing else.
>
> 2.According to Art 4.1 of ToR, item g and h
>
> Instead of consulting the community about all significant matters, 
> this member of executive committee wrote a personal blog, raising 
> concerns around SEEDIG in public. More than that, he was writing 
> personal emails to the sponsors, without knowledge of community or, to 
> the best of my knowledge, rest of executive committee. The emails was 
> forwarded to me by some sponsors, with whom I have very active 
> business. Blog can be found here 
> https://blog.caf.si/2019/11/reflections-on-my-two-years-in-seedig.html.
>
> If you are surprised with this blog from November, it’s exactly what 
> is regulated by those items g and h in ToR – you should not be, but 
> you are. Also you can easily see that, roughly, half of this blog is 
> not true (there are mailings in the archive that proves he wrongly 
> explained certain moments in SEEDIG history, which he was not taking 
> part) and half of the blog are alleged issues and problems which he 
> NEEDED to share with community and colleagues in exe com. This way, 
> without knowledge of entire community, he criticizes many thing, 
> expressing his opinion based on mostly wrong facts, and he created 
> fake news, the worst kind – mix of “a little bit of truth” and “a 
> little bit of fake” makes the “perfect deal”. More on that, the blog 
> was shared on social networks by some of the sponsors with a lot of 
> question marks about the future of SEEDIG, and by that, he was ruining 
> hardly built trust between sponsors and SEEDIG as initiative.
>
> I don’t know how it went with members of exe com or other members of 
> SEEDIG, but I was spending a lot of my time to answer to some of the 
> sponsors, connected with them in my line of business, that truth is 
> not written in that blog.
>
> 3.According to Art 4.1 of ToR, item h
>
> Recent meddling in election process, by asking for a report which is 
> not regulated by ToR, and to the best of my knowledge, not in any 
> decision of exe com, through the mail sent to the list: there is a 
> concern that he was trying to intimidate the chair and all members of 
> election committee. At least, by asking that, he was putting pressure 
> to the election committee and all members, obviously not happy with 
> the preliminary results, jeopardizing the whole election process and 
> undermining the work of election committee. This is a very bad and 
> dangerous practice shown from this exe com member, and he should be 
> removed just for that.
>
> 4.According to Art 4.2 of ToR
>
> It’s really questionable if this member of executive was fulfilling 
> obligation of 5-6 working hours per week: If the regular obligations 
> was not finished on time, as described in the reason under point 1., 
> he obviously was not fulfilling this obligation also.
>
> Conclusion – according to ToR, he is not fit to serve as exe com 
> member, obviously he is not fit to work in a team and what is worse, 
> he is putting the whole SEEDIG initiative in danger by his “personally 
> initiated” (in)activities. It will be a big danger if he stays one 
> more year of his mandate as a member.
>
> In line with Art 7.3 in the ToR, I ask and invite community members to 
> back up this petition - it needs 10% of the total number of members of 
> this list to trigger a vote on removing Dusan Caf from the exe com. If 
> you are concern about SEEDIG, this is a concrete way to express your 
> concerns and clean up what is hidden under the carpet.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dusan Stojicevic
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.rnids.rs/pipermail/seedig/attachments/20191217/2e33d81a/attachment.htm>