[Icann-see] Fwd: Web site seedig.net

[Narine Khachatryan]

Dear Dusan and all,

Thank you for your email. Indeed "It is wise to be polite, and it is stupid
to be rude" (Arthur Schopenhauer) and the best way to overcome such a
behavior is to engage in a reasonable conversation.

The proposal is not a single opinion, and the topic has been many times
discussed at various instances in Internet Governance circles.

Best regards,

Narine

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 2:24 AM, Dusan Stojicevic <dusan at dukes.in.rs> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> When You have single opinion, without support, it's possible to get some
> kind of accusations and other kind of impolite behavior. Positive
> thinking is the best way to overcome these kind of situations:
> "Chaos often breeds life, when order breeds habit."
> – Henry Adams
>
> Thank You all again for all Your inputs! Also, I want to encourage You
> to further discuss new site seedig.net and I want to invite You all to
> SEEDIG planning meetings
> (
> http://www.seedig.net/2016/01/08/two-virtual-planning-meetings-on-14-and-15-january/
> ).
>
> Cheers,
> Dusan
>
>
> On 13.1.2016 22:31, Narine Khachatryan wrote:
> > Hello again,
> >
> > In that case we will continue without any criterions and any rules. I
> > understand your approach well, our universe was created out of chaos,
> > after all.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Narine
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:31 AM, Dusan Stojicevic <dusan at dukes.in.rs
> > <mailto:dusan at dukes.in.rs>> wrote:
> >
> >     Dear all,
> >
> >     If there is a bottom-up initiative about the process or some rules,
> >     there should be comments by many others in the community. If there
> are
> >     no comments, then what you have is a single opinion.
> >
> >     Regards,
> >     Dusan
> >
> >
> >
> >     On 13.1.2016 20:23, Narine Khachatryan wrote:
> >     > Dear Dusan,
> >     >
> >     > My suggestion below about developing common criterions for proper
> >     > stakeholder representation was not commented by you. It's a
> sensitive
> >     > issue, certainly. Do we have enough capacities and knowledge to
> touch it
> >     > upon?
> >     >
> >     > Best regards,
> >     >
> >     > Narine
> >     >
> >     > ​On
> >     > Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 1:09 AM
> >     > ​
> >     > *
> >     > ​
> >     > Narine Khachatryan* <ms.narine.khachatryan at gmail.com
> >     <mailto:ms.narine.khachatryan at gmail.com>
> >     > <mailto:ms.narine.khachatryan at gmail.com
> >     <mailto:ms.narine.khachatryan at gmail.com>>>
> >     > ​ wrote:​
> >     > ​
> >     > Dear Dusan,
> >     >
> >     > A small remark regarding
> >     > ​what can be added to
> >     > SEEDIG process, as you suggested in the previous email. I looked
> >     through
> >     > ​
> >     >  http://www.seedig.net/about/ .
> >     >
> >     > It has been noted by many Internet Governance activists, that one
> >     of the
> >     > main issues of multistakeholderism has been related to an
> appropriate
> >     > stakeholder representation, as well as the inclusion of
> >     underrepresented
> >     > groups, so on and so forth.
> >     >
> >     > Since different organisations represent and advocate for various
> >     > interests (with the purpose of finding a common ground), and since
> not
> >     > rarely representatives wear many hats, could we in frames of SEEDIG
> >     > process develop a common approach to stakeholder representation
> issue.
> >     >
> >     > That common approach, based on certain criterions, could help us
> to be
> >     > if not more accurate, but at least more adequate in issues, such as
> >     > 'which hat is primary for this or that representative'.
> >     >
> >     > Do we give priority to people who wear several hats? If yes, how
> do we
> >     > decide (based on what criterions) which stakeholder group he/she
> >     > represents primarily? We all know about colliding interests.
> >     >
> >     > Or on the contrary do we try to engage people who represent only a
> >     > single stakeholder group?
> >     >
> >     > This common approach / framework could also be another effort
> >     towards if
> >     > not including, but at least not missing important voices of parts
> >     of the
> >     > public who are usually unable to deliver their voices effectively.
> >     >
> >     > ​Best regards,
> >     >
> >     > Narine​
> >     ​
> >
> >
> >
>
> ---
> Ova e-pošta je provjerena na viruse Avast protuvirusnim programom.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Ova e-mail poruka je poverljiva i namenjena iskljucivo primaocu.
> Neovlascena distribucija, prepravka ili objavljivanje njenog sadrzaja je
> zabranjena. Ako ste ovaj e-mail primili greskom, molimo vas da obavestite
> administratora liste putem telefona +381 11 7281281.
>
> This e-mail is confidential and intended only for the recipient.
> Unauthorized distribution, modification or disclosure of its contents is
> prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
> mailing list administrator by telephone +381 11 7281281.
>
> -----
>
> Icann-see mailing lista
> Icann-see at rnids.rs
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.rnids.rs/pipermail/seedig/attachments/20160114/6a1e720b/attachment.htm>