[Icann-see] Fwd: Web site seedig.net

[Dusan Stojicevic]

Dear all,

When You have single opinion, without support, it's possible to get some
kind of accusations and other kind of impolite behavior. Positive
thinking is the best way to overcome these kind of situations:
"Chaos often breeds life, when order breeds habit."
– Henry Adams

Thank You all again for all Your inputs! Also, I want to encourage You
to further discuss new site seedig.net and I want to invite You all to
SEEDIG planning meetings
(http://www.seedig.net/2016/01/08/two-virtual-planning-meetings-on-14-and-15-january/).

Cheers,
Dusan


On 13.1.2016 22:31, Narine Khachatryan wrote:
> Hello again, 
> 
> In that case we will continue without any criterions and any rules. I
> understand your approach well, our universe was created out of chaos,
> after all. 
> 
> Best regards, 
> 
> Narine 
> 
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:31 AM, Dusan Stojicevic <dusan at dukes.in.rs
> <mailto:dusan at dukes.in.rs>> wrote:
> 
>     Dear all,
> 
>     If there is a bottom-up initiative about the process or some rules,
>     there should be comments by many others in the community. If there are
>     no comments, then what you have is a single opinion.
> 
>     Regards,
>     Dusan
> 
> 
> 
>     On 13.1.2016 20:23, Narine Khachatryan wrote:
>     > Dear Dusan,
>     >
>     > My suggestion below about developing common criterions for proper
>     > stakeholder representation was not commented by you. It's a sensitive
>     > issue, certainly. Do we have enough capacities and knowledge to touch it
>     > upon?
>     >
>     > Best regards,
>     >
>     > Narine
>     >
>     > ​On
>     > Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 1:09 AM
>     > ​
>     > *
>     > ​
>     > Narine Khachatryan* <ms.narine.khachatryan at gmail.com
>     <mailto:ms.narine.khachatryan at gmail.com>
>     > <mailto:ms.narine.khachatryan at gmail.com
>     <mailto:ms.narine.khachatryan at gmail.com>>>
>     > ​ wrote:​
>     > ​
>     > Dear Dusan,
>     >
>     > A small remark regarding
>     > ​what can be added to
>     > SEEDIG process, as you suggested in the previous email. I looked
>     through
>     > ​
>     >  http://www.seedig.net/about/ .
>     >
>     > It has been noted by many Internet Governance activists, that one
>     of the
>     > main issues of multistakeholderism has been related to an appropriate
>     > stakeholder representation, as well as the inclusion of
>     underrepresented
>     > groups, so on and so forth.
>     >
>     > Since different organisations represent and advocate for various
>     > interests (with the purpose of finding a common ground), and since not
>     > rarely representatives wear many hats, could we in frames of SEEDIG
>     > process develop a common approach to stakeholder representation issue.
>     >
>     > That common approach, based on certain criterions, could help us to be
>     > if not more accurate, but at least more adequate in issues, such as
>     > 'which hat is primary for this or that representative'.
>     >
>     > Do we give priority to people who wear several hats? If yes, how do we
>     > decide (based on what criterions) which stakeholder group he/she
>     > represents primarily? We all know about colliding interests.
>     >
>     > Or on the contrary do we try to engage people who represent only a
>     > single stakeholder group?
>     >
>     > This common approach / framework could also be another effort
>     towards if
>     > not including, but at least not missing important voices of parts
>     of the
>     > public who are usually unable to deliver their voices effectively.
>     >
>     > ​Best regards,
>     >
>     > Narine​
>     ​ 
> 
> 
> 

---
Ova e-pošta je provjerena na viruse Avast protuvirusnim programom.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus