[Icann-see] SEEDIG - Call for input on draft session descriptions. DL: 22 March

[Oksana Prykhodko]

Dear Sorina, dear all,

Thank you very much for excellent work!

I fully support all your wordings and ready to participate in any session
 I am mentioned in.

The only one small proposition - to add to  *Multistakeholder Internet
governance mechanisms/approaches at national level *the discussion of the
role of international and regional organizations (such as ICANN, Council of
Europe, etc.) in initiating/organizing national mechanisms of MS and to
discuss not only participation (or lack of participation) of national
representatives in regional or global events, but also vice versa.

Best regards,
Oksana



On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Sorina Teleanu <sorina.teleanu at cdep.ro>
wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> As agreed during the previous virtual meeting, Lianna, Naser and I have
> worked on some draft session descriptions for the four sessions included in
> the SEEDIG's draft programme. We have also consulted Loreta Vioiu, from the
> Council of Europe, with regards to the session on human rights.
>
> Attached is a revised version of the draft programme outline, which
> includes, for each of the four sessions:
> - the initial outline of the session (from the previous version of the
> draft programme - this will be removed once we agree on the session
> description);
> - a proposed session description (which is, basically, a more
> expanded/detailed version of the initial outline). In some cases you will
> notice some text in square brackets. This means that we are not sure
> whether that specific text should be included or not.
> - some notes on: key participants, moderator, remote moderator (a remote
> moderator is a person who will facilitate the interaction between those
> participating online, via the remote participation platform, and the onsite
> participants), rapporteur. In some instances, we have added some names, as
> possible options. But in other cases you will just see empty spaces.
> - a space to add links to documents/materials that are relevant to the
> session. We have thought that it would be useful to add such materials, so
> that participants can read in advance of the session and understand the
> topics better.
>
> You are now all kindly invited to provide your comments and suggestions on
> this revised version of the programme, by 22 March:
> 1. Please indicate whether you agree with the proposed session
> descriptions or whether you have comments and/or suggestions for revisions.
> If you want to make revisions, you are kindly invited to make them directly
> on the attached document, using track changes (so we can easily notice the
> changes). Some brief motivations for your proposed revisions will also be
> appreciated.
> 2. If at this stage you have ideas for possible key participants,
> moderators, remote moderators or rapporteurs, please add those in the
> document as well. Please note that you do not have to contact such persons
> yet, as the idea is to first have a pool of possible names to choose from
> in a next step. Please also take into account that the focus of the
> sessions might suffer changes based on the comments we received during the
> next two weeks.
> 3. Please feel free to add links to resources you think are relevant for
> each session.
>
> Note: we should try to adhere, as much as possible, to the EuroDIG session
> principles, especially with regards to ensuring stakeholder balances
> dialogue and considering geographical and gender balance:
> http://www.eurodig.org/get-involved/organising-a-session/#jfmulticontent_c363-3
> As some of our session are intended to have a capacity building dimension,
> thus inviting key participants from some specific entities, we might not be
> able to follow such principles in all instances.
>
> Next steps:
> After the 22 March deadline, we will organise another virtual meeting,
> most probably in the week of 23 March (I will send a Doodle poll for that),
> to discuss the input received. The aim of this virtual meeting will be to
> first agree on the session descriptions and then, depending on the results
> of this consultation, look into the options for possible key participants,
> moderators, rapporteurs.
>
> Meanwhile, I would also like to encourage you all to use the invitation
> template we have developed in our previous meeting in order to reach out to
> your respective communities and invite people to participate in the SEEDIG.
> Likewise, please also let us know if you have any suggestion/idea for
> possible sponsors. While the logistics costs for the event will be covered
> from the EuroDIG budget (many thanks to EuroDIG Secretariat for making this
> possible), we need to ensure we have participants in the event - and any
> amount that could go into funding some participants will be of great help.
> I will also suggest that the first item of discussion in our next virtual
> meeting is outreach and sponsorship.
>
> Thank you all and looking forward to your feedback. And special thanks to
> Lianna, Naser and Loreta for their help with the session descriptions.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Sorina
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Ova e-mail poruka je poverljiva i namenjena iskljucivo primaocu.
> Neovlascena distribucija, prepravka ili objavljivanje njenog sadrzaja je
> zabranjena. Ako ste ovaj e-mail primili greskom, molimo vas da obavestite
> administratora liste putem telefona +381 11 7281281.
>
> This e-mail is confidential and intended only for the recipient.
> Unauthorized distribution, modification or disclosure of its contents is
> prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
> mailing list administrator by telephone +381 11 7281281.
>
> -----
>
> Icann-see mailing lista
> Icann-see at rnids.rs
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.rnids.rs/pipermail/seedig/attachments/20150310/f49e2b6c/attachment.htm>