[Icann-see] Future of SEEDIG: call for comments (DL: 12 July)
Yuriy Kargapolov
yvk at uanic.net
Sat Jul 11 20:31:10 CEST 2015
Dear All,
If shortly and quickly
To my opinion, SEEDIG should be separate discussion platform but with
effective the communication channel to overall European agenda from
Lisbon to Kamchatka.
We have the subjects and issues to talk substantively and
thoughtfully, we have issues to offer the European and the World
communities as well as for contribution in existing agenda's points
and for the new challenges that we can offer to discuss.
If not shortly and quickly... I don't have detailed views on "how we
can solve the architecture questions of SEEDIG building" that were
voiced by Sorina.
With best regards,
Yuri
>> Thursday, July 9, 2015, 4:49:34 PM, you wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>> It was good in Sofia, and I hope that You all had a good time there. But
>>> this is behind us, and we need to open another page and talk about the
>>> future of this initiative.
>>> As far as I can see, talking with some of You in person in Sofia and
>>> after SEEDIG, there is a strong support for this initiative and strong
>>> will for SEEDIG 2016.
>>> But, if You want SEEDIG 2016, please, give us some feedback on this mail.
>>> I know that You need almost 2 days to read it (My dear Sorina is a true
>>> expert in very long mails, best in the whole wide world ;) ), but...
>>> The mail is full with questions and it also includes some possible ways
>>> forward, so please think about those issues and share your views.
>>> Thank You in advance!
>>> Dusan
>>> (on personal behalf)
>>> On 6.7.2015 8:28, Sorina Teleanu wrote:
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> On behalf of the SEEDIG executive committee, I am writing to you with regards to the future of SEEDIG, and, more specifically, a potential SEEDIG 2016 meeting.
>>>>
>>>> As you know, SEEDIG 2015 was organised in conjunction with the eighth EuroDIG, for several reasons. The most important ones were related to the fact that EuroDIG itself was held in the SEE region, and that we had an opportunity to create some connections between SEE Internet governance-related realities and the pan-European debates. The funds allocated from the EuroDIG budget (for logistics, catering, travel support, as detailed in our report), as well as the general support from EuroDIG Secretariat for a first SEEDIG meeting have been equally important.
>>>>
>>>> I. Key questions
>>>> As there seems to be at least a majority of views that SEEDIG should continue (and not remain a one time event), we need to determine how this moving forward should/could actually happen.
>>>> The two main questions that we now need to ask ourselves are the following:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Should a SEEDIG 2016 meeting be held again in conjunction with the EuroDIG meeting to be hosted in Brussels? OR
>>>>
>>>> 1. Should a SEEDIG 2016 meeting be held in the SEE region, as a stand-alone event?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> II. Issues to consider
>>>> However, determining how SEEDIG 2016 would look like is not just a matter of picking a location, as there are several important issues that need to be considered before making a decision:
>>>>
>>>> 1. participation (attendance at the meeting) and influencing factors (travel costs, travel funds, etc.);
>>>>
>>>> 2. financial resources /sponsors;
>>>>
>>>> 3. host for the meeting (including broad-based stakeholder conditions in the host country);
>>>>
>>>> 4. partners/supporters;
>>>>
>>>> 5. maintaining linkages between SEE and the wider Europe.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> III. Possible approach
>>>> Drawing on several informal discussions held with some of you in the weeks following SEEDIG (including the ICANN meeting in Buenos Aires), one possible approach for SEEDIG 2016 could be to:
>>>>
>>>> * keep the SEEDIG and EuroDIG preparatory processes together, but have the SEEDIG meeting organised somewhere in the region, at a time that precedes the EuroDIG meeting.
>>>>
>>>> III.1. Implications
>>>> In practical terms, the approach above would mean that:
>>>>
>>>> 1. The call for proposals for topics for SEEDIG and EuroDIG 2016 are launched at the same time (October until December 2015), as part of a single process.
>>>>
>>>> 2. SEEDIG is represented at the EuroDIG preparatory meeting. A preparatory meeting for SEEDIG is also intended to be held in the host country (for the purpose of checking the logistics and related issues).
>>>>
>>>> 3. SEEDIG-related content continues to be hosted on the EuroDIG website and wiki.
>>>>
>>>> 4. SEEDIG takes place in a country within SEE and the neighbouring area, some time before the EuroDIG meeting, and becomes an integrated milestone in the EuroDIG preparatory process. Results should feed directly into the EuroDIG session planning process and become an inclusive part of the EuroDIG programme. SEEDIG could actually be the place to prepare, inter alia, a SEE-focused session at EuroDIG.
>>>>
>>>> III.2. Advantages
>>>> Such an approach would have several advantages, among which:
>>>>
>>>> 1. SEEDIG, as a meeting, remains in the region. This would respond to the concerns raised by some of you with regards to both the difficulty for most stakeholders in SEE to attend an event outside the region, as well as to a potentially limited relevance of having a SEE event held in Western Europe. And it could/should encourage significant participation from within the region, given that the travel costs involved are expected to be self-manageable by many potential participants.
>>>>
>>>> 2. SEEDIG and EuroDIG remain interlinked, thus responding to the need to ensure that the voices of SEE stakeholders go beyond the SEE region and that the pan-European debates on Internet governance are also considering SEE concerns.
>>>>
>>>> 3. SEEDIG continues to benefit from support from EuroDIG (in terms of preparatory process, hosting content and funding for some SEE attendees to participate in the EuroDIG meeting), and, possibly, its partners, thus gaining more recognition within the Internet governance ecosystem.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> III.3. Challenges
>>>> There are, of course, a number of challenges that would need to be dealt with, in the case of this approach being taken forward:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Financial resources. SEEDIG will need to have its own budget, and, thus engage in fund raising activities, including within the region. Additionally, legal issues will have to be considered, such as: setting up a bank account, responsibility and liability in terms of managing contracts, invoices, reporting on the finances (i.e. what entity would do this?), etc.
>>>>
>>>> 2. Keeping the SEEDIG 2015 supporters as partners. We would need to finding a way to enhance such partnerships, as they would demonstrate that SEEDIG is backed by others and does not try to isolate itself from other entities and processes in the Internet governance ecosystem. Having this kind of institutional support would also help us when approaching possible sponsors.
>>>>
>>>> 3. Ensuring that the linkages with EuroDIG mean more than just having SEEDIG messages presented at EuroDIG. Finding a way to bring a significant number of SEE participants to EuroDIG (in addition to them participating in SEEDIG) and to actively involve them in the EuroDIG process and meeting is an important aspect to consider. (More travel and time resources will be needed.)
>>>>
>>>> 4. Identifying a host. During the discussions in Buenos Aires, Serbia/Belgrade was mentioned as a possible location, given that the country has a working multistakeholder Internet governance model in place and this can be useful as an example for participants in SEEDIG. In addition, another argument invoked for having the next SEEDIG meeting in Serbia was related to the experience the various entities in the country have in organising/hosting Internet governance events (EuroDIG 2011, DIDS, etc.).
>>>>
>>>> 5. Human resources to run the preparatory process. Organising SEEDIG as a stand-alone event would require more efforts, both in terms of logistics and programme. The organising group would, therefore, need to be reinforced, and more volunteers would have to be involved in the process.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> IV. Call for comments
>>>> Given all of the above, you are all kindly invited to provide your input with regards to the future of SEEDIG, in the form of comments, suggestions, support for or disagreement with the aforementioned possible approach, etc., until Sunday, 12 July 2015. Please send your input to this mailing list and to see at intgovforum.org.
>>>>
>>>> All input will be compiled by the executive committee, shared with the list, and further discussed at a virtual meeting, to be held after the above-mentioned deadline (details to be communicated later). It is expected that a final decision regarding the approach for a SEEDIG 2016 meeting (questions at point I.A and B above) will be taken at this virtual meeting. Once this decision is made, further discussions will be held with regards to the preparatory process for SEEDIG 2016.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you and we are looking forward to your feedback.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Sorina
>>>> (on behalf of the executive committee)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Sorina Teleanu
>>>> Parliamentary assistant
>>>> Chamber of Deputies
>>>> Parliament of Romania
>>>> 2-4 Izvor Street, Bucharest, Romania
>>>> Tel: +40 21 414 1842
>>> ---
>>> Ova e-pošta je provjerena na viruse Avast protuvirusnim programom.
>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ova e-mail poruka je poverljiva i namenjena iskljucivo primaocu.
>>> Neovlascena distribucija, prepravka ili objavljivanje njenog
>>> sadrzaja je zabranjena. Ako ste ovaj e-mail primili greskom, molimo
>>> vas da obavestite administratora liste putem telefona +381 11 7281281.
>>> This e-mail is confidential and intended only for the recipient.
>>> Unauthorized distribution, modification or disclosure of its
>>> contents is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
>>> please notify the mailing list administrator by telephone +381 11 7281281.
>>> -----
>>>
>>> Icann-see mailing lista
>>> Icann-see at rnids.rs
--
З повагою,
Голова Регламентного комітету,
Ю. Каргаполов mailto:yvk at uanic.net
More information about the seedig
mailing list