[Icann-see] Pre-EuroDIG South Eastern European Round Table

Dušan Stojičević dusan at dukes.in.rs
Sun Nov 23 20:43:07 CET 2014

Dear all,

@Sorina - Dear Sorina, thanks for rising up those crucial question. I'll 
try in next mail to discuss some of the things that You mentioned and I 
will share my thoughts.

@all - some news from Serbia
This was a busy week regarding IGF in Serbia. "Internet Dijalog Srbije - 
IDS 2014", or serbian IGF, was held last week. This meeting was 
organized by our Ministry of Trade,  Telecomunications and Tourism, and 
here is translation of media coverage:
"State Secretary in Ministry of Trade, Tourism and Telecommunications, 
Tatjana Matic, opened on Tuesday at the National Assembly in Belgrade, 
conference "Internet dialogue Serbia", which is an initiative open for 
informal discussion of stakeholders from all over Serbia on issues of 
development, use and management of the Internet.//
//Tatjana Matic stressed the need to continue with the promotion of 
digital entrepreneurship and creating a favorable environment for 
start-commands and tasks based on new technologies that bring new jobs. 
There must be support for new development technologies, to citizens, an 
innovative web-entrepreneurs and other entrepreneurs could take 
advantage of all benefits that these technologies offer.//
//"It is necessary to develop and implement measures to ensure that 
citizens and businesses feel safer and more secure online, which would 
be able to fully realize the benefits that provides the digital 
economy," said Secretary of State.//
//Secretary of State pointed out that global Internet governance should 
be legitimate, transparent, accountable, sustainable and inclusive, 
which means that the Internet should remain open, as the leading force 
of innovation and international resources, to the benefit of all citizens.//
////The aim of the conference is to bring together and encourage all 
interested parties in Serbia to exchange views and best practices, to 
propose new initiatives that will enhance the development and use of the 
Internet in Serbia, as well as to consider the issues that will be the 
subject of discussion at meetings of the European and global dialogue on 
Internet governance."//
/In short: There was two panels on conference. First panel was all about 
security (children, personal data, cyber police...), with panelists from 
Government and NGOs. We all recognized crucial need - forming serbian 
SIRT, and before that - forming security strategy.
Second panel was about adoption of new technologies. It was open dialog, 
and many question was raised and many answers was given from policy and 
decision makers.
Personally, as one of the panelist in the second panel, I was talking 
about the lack of IPv6 and IDN usage in Serbia.
Bottom line, it was a good dialogue.


On 22.11.2014 16:40, Sorina Teleanu wrote:
> Dear all,
> As you have seen in the EuroDIG newsletter circulated by Sandra, EuroDIG has re-confirmed the plans for a SEE round table the day before EuroDIG 2015. As the time is running quickly, I think we need to kick-start the discussions on the preparations for this event.
> First, many thanks to Sandra and Wolf for their responses and suggestions in reply to my previous email and to Dusan for setting up this mailing list.
> Base on these latests exchanges, I think there are few things we should start considering/discussing about. I am listing them below, together with a summary of our previous discussions,  and kindly invite all of you to share your thoughts.
> 1. Objective of the event and expected results
> Q: What do we want to achieve with this event? Capacity-building/awareness raising etc?
> Previous discussions:
> - “There is lack of awareness among policy and decision makers of the importance of digital policy and Internet governance. New Policy guidelines of the European Commission outline digital policy as one of the top priorities of Europe in future (see a blog). While they will realise it sooner or later, we need to help it happen sooner and focus on building capacities of the governments and institutions to deal with new issues in a meaningful way (security with freedoms, data protection and privacy with security, open market with net neutrality, etc).”
> - “Initially, explaining the benefits of multistakeholder approach for national IG; then, building multistakeholder policy-making mechanisms (like CGI.br) in SEE countries; also increasing cooperation among the SEE states on IG issues (cybersecurity may be a first good step for cooperation).”
> - Address the lack of understanding of the Internet as an ecosystem (Internet and IG regarded as a technical and judicial issue) and the need for basic education on IG;
> 2. Identifying the key needs/issues/possible themes
> Q: What should be the theme(s) of the event? What issues do we want to discuss?
> Previous discussions:
> - the need for capacity building, and responding to a perceived lack of information on IG issues;
> - recognizing what are Internet governance issues in the first place;
> - learn more about what is ICANN; what are registries / registrars;
> - security & privacy;
> - the multi-stakeholder model - what is community-driven policy? How does it work?
> - digital divide;
> - IDNs;
> - content localisation;
> - cybercrime;
> - censorship/interference with content.
> 3. Format and duration of the event
> This is closely related to point 2 above and the number of issues we choose to discuss.
> Q: How to frame the discussions? What format should the event have? Do we aim to have a half day event or a full day event?
> Based on our previous discussions, and having in mind that we all admit there is not much awareness in SEE about IG, in general, my initial thoughts would be the following:
> We could use this event to: promote understanding about IG/IG issues; raise awareness and interest to participate in regional and international IG debates; explain the importance of developing multistakeholder IG models at national level.
> With such "objectives" is mind, I would see this event unfold in two sessions, under a general theme along these lines "Multistakeholder Internet governance: from the global debates to the SEE realities". The first session would be a more general one, in which to first explain the notions of IG, multistakeholder model, existing IG fora and institutions and then have an open discussion on why and how stakeholders in SEE should be more involved in IG debates and why and how to develop national multistakeholder mechanisms for IG. For the second session, we could choose one or two IG issues that are relevant from our region and have a discussion on how these issues are currently addressed within the region and how they could/should be further addressed within a multistakeholder framework, based on existing best practices and sharing experiences (for example: digital divide, development of local content,  management of ccTLDs etc.).
> As I have said, these are just some initial, general thoughts that I am sharing as a starting point for discussion. Please add in your suggestions and let's start building this event.  I understood that the Bulgarian host of EuroDIG 2015 will also come up with some ideas soon.
> ---
> While I know this email is already long, there are few more things I would like to mention:
> a. Do not forget about the EuroDIG's call for proposal: http://www.eurodig.org/get-involved/call-for-proposals/?no_cache=1 . I think it is also important for all of us to contribute to the EuroDIG call, as the input submitted will shape the agenda of the next year’s EuroDIG. Thinking about what Wolf mentioned in one of his previous emails, it would be good to have the SEE voice heard not only during the pre-event, but also within the EuroDIG itself.
> b. We also need to think about how to get people from the region to actually attend the pre-EuroDIG event. First, we need to spread the word about this event and try to bring as many people as possible to Sofia. What resources can we use for this? Suggestions?
> Second, EuroDIG is making efforts to attract funding for supporting travel for participants, but they also need our help. Does anyone have any idea/suggestion about who to approach to help with such funding? Maybe national ccTLD registries can help out sponsoring few participants from their countries; in addition to .mk, .rs, .bg and .ro, whose representative I understand are already on this list, can we reach out to other ccTLDs from the region?
> c. Regarding organizational aspects: Should we set up a small group of volunteers to take forward this process, keep track of our discussions, and maintain communication with the EuroDIG team?
> Also, Sandra has informed me that a EuroDIG mailing list will be provided later for us to move the discussions on this specific event there. And that we would need to indicate a contact person to be included in the EuroDIG team's page: http://www.eurodig.org/about/team/
> Thank you all for your patience in reading this far and I am looking forward to hearing from you.
> Best regards,
> Sorina
> --------
> Sorina Teleanu
> Parliamentary assistant
> Chamber of Deputies
> Parliament of Romania
> 2-4 Izvor Street, Bucharest, Romania
> Tel: +40 21 414 1842
> E-mail: sorina.teleanu at cdep.ro
> Website: www.cdep.ro
> _______________________________________________
> Ova e-mail poruka je poverljiva i namenjena iskljucivo primaocu.  Neovlascena distribucija, prepravka ili objavljivanje njenog sadrzaja je zabranjena. Ako ste ovaj e-mail primili greskom, molimo vas da obavestite administratora liste putem telefona +381 11 7281281.
> This e-mail is confidential and intended only for the recipient.  Unauthorized distribution, modification or disclosure of its contents is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the mailing list administrator by telephone +381 11 7281281.
> -----
> Icann-see mailing lista
> Icann-see at rnids.rs

avast! antivirus zaštita je aktivna stoga ova e-pošta nema virusa i zlonamjernih programa.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.rnids.rs/pipermail/seedig/attachments/20141123/ee647d05/attachment.htm>

More information about the seedig mailing list